May 18, 2007
Immigration Reform
TSO should vote for me, then.
I am openly in favor of an almost completely open border with Mexico.
If we are going to talk about immigration abuse, lets get all of the non-Native Californians to pack up and go home first.
You're better off in
Beautiful Texas,
Oklahoma, Kansas, Georgia,
Tennessee.
I could probably get behind a border wall that runs North-South, along the Eastern edges of Modoc to Imperial Counties. It could bend west up in Modoc County, as Oregonians are only a stone's throw from Lower Canada, and the Frozen North herself.
I saw a bumper sticker today that brought out my Teutono-Roman invasiveness.
"You are on Indian Land."
Not anymore. Europeans won that war. And if someone were to come out with a proposal to wipe the last vestiges of pagan Indian culture off the continent, I would support it, even if it means eliminating some valid cultural expressions that could still possibly be disentangled from the paganism, for instance the languages.
Massive immigration is imperialism, and I support both. It is better to be European in culture than it is to be non-European in culture. It is better to be Latin in culture than it is to be Anglo in culture.
So we have Angloes, who have utterly failed at building an original culture, whining futilely about the coming of a vital culture. Angloes, you are doomed as a people. Get over yourselves.
"But they're stealing our jobs!"
I have a friend, a sort of liberal, who used to be an extreme liberal, but is gradually moving rightward. In about five years he will probably salute photos of Franco with me. This fellow is a contractor, and he has just about given up on hiring Angloes. They are, he says, lazy, whiny, and selfish. They demand to be overpaid and expect great praise for the most minor achievement. They suffer from more physical ailments, they are more sensitive to their work environment, they are more sensitive to comments and criticism, and they pay less attention to the quality of their work (Have you Driven a Ford Lately?).
Now, do I advocate shipping all the Angloes back to Anglia? It wouldn't break my heart if it were to happen, but, no, I don't. There are still some good, honorable Angloes. In fact, most of our native-born Angloes are pretty honorable folks. It is the outside agitators who come to California, expecting a California of their own Imagination, and proceed to build it. I have no fear for the long run, as they are doomed to fail. But in the short run, we have to deal with, and, ultimately, correct, all sorts of daft notions, which we are then credited with having given birth to.
No, the Angloes will become a complete irrelevancy very soon. The future of California is a Latin future, and it shall be a glorious future.
The only group that, as a group, should be completely denied entrance, and should face internment and deportation, regardless of their race or place of birth is Mohammedans. And a wall between Mexico and us will do nothing to help that.
PS To Kathy, no if immigration bothers you, stay in Canuckistan.
Posted by erik at May 18, 2007 9:39 AMIt isn't Indian anymore, and that is a good thing. Personally, I would have made no treaties that I did not intend to honor, but the greater offense would have been to honor treaties that stood in the way of European conquest.
By the way, you misread me. I do not like the Angloes any more than you. I support the next wave of conquest: a Latin one.
Posted by: Erik Keilholtz at September 27, 2007 1:16 AMWhat are any of you so proud of? You ARE on Indian land. The United States was founded on the genocide of a people who initially took it for granted that treaties were to be honored and fought back when they realized that wasn't about to happen. And remember that your "land of the free" was built on slavery---the stealing of a human being by another human being. In either case, who made the first move? Who committed a crime first? It wasn't the Native Americans whose descendants have been relegated into reservations on barren land the government decided was worthless enough to give them; and it wasn't the Africans who were stolen from their countries, and whose descendants, because of that, have had to endure racism and the flagrantly wrong stigma that black people will always be inferior to the white man. No, the "Anglo" governments and their emissaries dealt the first of many inhumane blows. So which crime do you take so much pride in?---broken treaties, genocide or enslavement. Be humble in your pride; you seem to want to build on a legacy whose shame we should learn from. The only thing good that can come of it is WISDOM---the wisdom to know such arrogance and the destruction that comes with it should die the moment our conscience says it should. I doubt any of this makes sense to you. My guess would be you'd chalk me up as a bleeding-heart liberal who doesn't know jack about the real world, so these words don't matter much. But I know the difference between what's right and what's wrong, same as anyone on God's green earth, and deep down that includes you, too. I just highly recommend that you be humble in your pride---because in the case of America and the governing you espouse, your pride has absolutely nothing to do with honor. Find some time to be QUIET and actually THINK. Ranting belongs to the world of mad men; try not to prove it.
Posted by: Jack at September 26, 2007 9:23 PMShucks. I figured that that was the case. It was worth a try.
Perhaps New South Wales?
Posted by: Erik Keilholtz at May 24, 2007 12:31 AMAnglia has no need of the barbarian pseudo-Anglos on your side of the Atlantic. We may have fought against their independence, but cultural and physical mutations since then make us more than happy to be separated from them by an ocean.
Posted by: Integralist at May 23, 2007 6:12 PMYes! And not only is he part Latin in his heritage, he also has Austrian ancestry, so that there would be some continuity. He is a Native Son, and has a Plan for restoring the luster of the Golden State.
Look into my eyes...
He is willing, although not eager to take the reigns of state, realizing that it may just be his civic duty. Sure he would rather sit quietly and simply live his life, but circumstances demand that he take up the burden of state.
Got any good Latin candidates to depose the Austrian pretender and serve as Dictator for Life of California?
Posted by: Anonymous at May 18, 2007 8:31 PM