Erik's Rant
 

November 3, 2006

Free Press, Free Elections, Bah Humbug

When elections degenerate to the point of the candidates accusing each other of various degrees of insensitivity, it is time to scrap the whole thing. What is even more maddening is when the charges of
"hypocricy" are thrown around.

This, of course, brings me to the case of Haggard (not Merle, although God knows he has had his share of scandals). As any of my readers know, I consider Protestantism a devilish disease, and Protestant heresiarchs worthy of harsh punishments.

However, I take no joy in watching this nonsense about whether or not Haggard was doing really foul things with a homosexual prostitute, or whether he was just buying his meth from him. I want to see a Prottie heresiarch leave his job because he finds Truth. I want him to say, "I am sick of pretending to be the Pope. I want to be part of the Church Christ founded."

I especially don't want to see the charges coming from a homosexual prostitute and drug dealer whose newfound sense of the common good just forces him to breach client confidentiality (what ever happened to honor among thieves? I guess it does not apply to sodomitical dope pushers) a week before an election where Haggard has been working for a ballot measure.

What is worse is that these charges are being taken seriously as part of the dialog of ideas.

Whoever said that Democracy is the system where the voters get what they deserve (along with Menken's addition that they get it good and hard) is right, although the idea is not often enough seen to its fulfillment: the bad results will happen in the poorly selected administration, sure, but ultimately the center will not hold, and I don't want to hear any whining when the Authoritarian Restoration takes over.

You people had your chance, and blew it worrying about Allen's macaca, Haggard's sodomitical meth salesman, and on and on and on.

In Oakland I am designing a T-Shirt that says "He's Not My Mayor."

Perhaps I should change it to "It's Not My Liberal Democracy."

Posted by erik at November 3, 2006 1:27 PM
Comments

It is certainly saddest for his family. At least Bishop Ziemann did not have children.

It would be great if this Haggard fellow has the cojones to use his scandal to preach about the dangers and traps of homosexualism and hedonism.

Posted by: Erik Keilholtz at November 5, 2006 6:58 PM

My first thought when I heard this was to wonder why the confessed male prostitute and drug dealer wasn't being hauled before the judge himself.

Posted by: alicia at November 5, 2006 2:14 PM

Well said. Its all so sordid, and if it was a truly Catholic world, he'd go to confession and amend his life... now we hear the story unfold from news report to news report : 1) he denies allegations 2) he confirms allegations, but didn't buy meth 3) he confirms allegations, did buy meth but NEVER USED IT (that one was rich) 4) He confirms allegations, does use Meth and is going into 30-day rehab where his church is embracing him and will continue his salary until he finds "healing".

After which he'll divorce his pretty wife and marry his secretary, or ur... his assistant.

Posted by: at November 4, 2006 2:55 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?