Erik's Rant
 

September 11, 2003

Semiotics in Music

One field that is particularly undeveloped is Musical Semiotics. It is a field that is ripe for it, because so much of western art music is based on the same foundation: Gregorian chant. Sometimes mining a piece of music for signs is easy: the oft used Dies Irae motif, for instance, or to take it to a higher level, a juxtaposition of Dies Irae with Deutschland Uber Alles could be a rather ham-fisted (yet accurate), sign for Nazi Germany.

The richest pieces to mine for signs are the late Romantics and post-Romantics: Gustav Mahler, Dmitri Shostakovich, Alexandr Scriabin, etc. I was first getting interested in semiotics in college and reading a lot of Eco, Barthes, Culler, etc. About a year into it, I was surprised when out of the blue, my theory professor, Anatole Leiken, announced that we were going to talk about applying semiotics to music. Prof. Leiken used Shostokovich as his example, and we studied a piece of his as being a biting critique of Stalinist cultural policies. It was hard to argue with the content, as the juxtapositions were clear, but there seemed something fishy about it. Why would someone in the middle of such a brutal regime risk his neck this way? Surely it wouldn't be a message in the bottle, since very few would get it outside of Russia.

But the more Prof. Leiken talked about Shostokovich, the more it made sense. They guy already expected to be arrested and enGulagged. To make it easier for his family, he used to spend nights standing outside his apartment, dressed and packed and ready to go when the police arrived. Since he thought he was a dead man, it was a way of getting it off his chest. He also knew that the Stalinists were such blunderheads they would not get the commentary (since he titled everything in an excruciatingly Commie orthodox manner: Ode to the Victims of Fascist Oppression).

Also, there is a rich tradition in Russia that goes back to the Czarist age of hiding political discourse in literary theory and criticism. Shostokovich simply moved this tradition into his own field.

What is interesting in the example of Shostokovich is that he worked in the full conscious knowledge that he was encoding his commentary in his work. I am more interested in the play between the language and the work in which the author is only partially aware, where the language caries its own burdens into the mix, and reveals to us aspects of our culture that we would not think of otherwise (as long as they are possible, plausible and proportionate - see my response to Peony in the last semiotics post).

What is interesting about this approach to musical analysis is that it is predicated on the Catholic foundation of our civilization. It's all based on the Chant!

All of this leads me to an announcement:

Expect the next two parts of The Building Blocks of Music as well as the next analysis this weekend! And please, keep in mind as we discuss Victimae paschali laudes, how these chants work their way into all later Western art music.

Posted by erik at September 11, 2003 12:04 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Jerry,

Thank you for linking this. I will hopefully have the time to look through it this weekend.

-Erik

Posted by: Erik at September 19, 2008 10:27 AM

sorry - wrong link - this is the schema
http://lostbiro.com/blog/?page_id=782

Cheers
Jerry

Posted by: Jerry at September 18, 2008 6:26 AM

You might find my sketch of a possible schema for a Hallidayan systemic functional semiotics of music of some interest - I'd be interested in your comments. http://fourstrings.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/music-a-systemic-functional-approach-revisited/

Cheers
Jerry

Posted by: Jerry at September 18, 2008 6:23 AM

Victor,

Wow! That sounds really interesting. Bernstein was a smart cookie, although he did say a lot of not-so-smart stuff on occasion (his natterings about the "Angel of Enterplanetary Death" are howlers, for instance). I will keep my eyes out for it. Chomsky is another smart cookie, although he has been mostly saying extremely un-smart things in recent years.

Posted by: Erik Keilholtz at September 13, 2003 10:51 PM

That previous comment was mine... victor of et cetera.

Posted by: at September 13, 2003 7:46 AM

Heh... I wrote my undergraduate thesis on the Phenomenology of Music. He may be off the mark in other respects, but you could try getting a hold of Leonard Bernstein's lectures where he applies Chomsky (I think... it was a while ago) to music and the result, in terms of musical meaning, is not unconvincing.

Posted by: at September 13, 2003 7:43 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?