Erik's Rant
 

September 9, 2003

Roma.

Matthew of the Shrine of the Holy Whapping is in Rome and is posting regularly. Whenever I read of Rome or see pictures of its churches, ruins, parks, shops, etc. I get a little bit sad, because I am not in Rome (even if I happen to be in San Francisco, which is the only other city that has that effect on me). I have family in Rome, even though we are not Romans (I have to admit that the Romanacci accent sounds a little silly to me, why can't they speak the language of Dante like the rest of us? OK, Pisano is not exactly Florentine, but it is closer than Romanacci). I don't even have a particular fondness for Roman food, finding it vastly inferior to our great Tuscan cuisine or that of the Umbrians.

But there is just something about Rome. It is an amazing city, one that, like Mexicali, sprawls all over the landscape, completely without a focal point. Just sprawling around and over the seven hills like a benevolent fog. Of course a fog is just what one wants in July or August when Rome is intolerable: hot, crowded, grimy, noisy. Hmm. Sounds good when I put it like that.

Rome is not a culinary city. Not only is their cuisine a second-tier Italian cuisine, you have to have either a friend or a very good eye for a good restaurant to find the ones that are worth going to. Its markets are not as good as others (I certainly don't know all of them, though), although one can find great gelato and bakeries in Rome.

I do not think that Rome is an easy city to like (it shares this trait with Mexicali. I bet you are all getting intrigued about Mexicali now. Another neat city but not really in the same league as Rome), but when it clicks, it is great.

Anyway, it will be fun enjoying the Eternal City vicariously through Matthew's posts!

Posted by erik at September 9, 2003 5:17 PM | TrackBack
Comments

By all means go to Mexicali, but do not get mad at me if you find it completely devoid of romance and charm and all that one looks for in "old Mexico." I will warn you that it is gritty, sprawling, industrial, dusty, noisy, and loud. But you find a little taco stand bustling with activity in the middle of all that, serving great tacos at 1am, you will see what I like about it.

Posted by: Erik Keilholtz at September 11, 2003 9:40 AM

Based on this recommendation I'll have to go to Mexicali sometime since it's a lot closer than Rome. And boy did I love Rome.

Posted by: T O'Rama at September 11, 2003 6:20 AM

Tecate is definitely more charming, while Mexicali is a sprawling, noisy, gritty mess of a city. Nothing is quite as pleasant as sitting in the Zocalo of Tecate, drinking beer, listening to the norteño conjuntos. Tecate doesn't have a bullring, though, but it does have a little caffè whose owner's husband is from bologna. One of the few places outside of Tijuana to get a decent espresso in the state. I did not find espresso in Mexicali.

Posted by: Erik Keilholtz at September 10, 2003 11:20 AM

I like Mexicali OK, but my favorite border town will always be Tecate.
San Francisco is a town that I love to visit but could not live in unless I were insanely wealthy.

Posted by: alicia the midwife at September 10, 2003 9:25 AM

Beautiful. I'd like to hear more sometime about what San Francisco has in common with Rome.

Posted by: Jeff Culbreath at September 9, 2003 10:49 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?